NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2006) 149 LGERA 321
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Peters & Anor v Manly Municipal Council & Anor [2006] NSWLEC 676
APPLICANTS: Juliet Peters and Michael Voyias
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT: Manly Municipal Council
SECOND RESPONDENT: Manly Golf Club
FILE NUMBER(S) : 41145 of 2005
CORAM: Lloyd J
KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review :- - validity of development consent – residential zoning – underground car park - characterisation of use – ancillary use – multiple uses – innominate use
LEGISLATION CITED: Manly Local Environmental Plan 1998 Environmental Planning and Assessment Model Provisions 1980
Argyropoulos v Canterbury Municipal Council (1988) 66 LGRA 202 ; Colgate Palmolive Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Council, NSWLEC, Talbot J, 8 October 1996, unreported; CASES CITED: Egan v Hawkesbury City Council (1993) 79 LGERA 321; Foodbarn Pty Ltd v Solicitor-General for New South Wales (1975) 32 LGRA 157; Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council v Geoffrey Twibill & Associates (1979) 39 LGRA 154; Wotton v Wingecarribee Shire Council (1989) 68 LGRA 38
DATES OF HEARING: 29/08/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/01/2006
APPLICANTS: K Rose (barrister) SOLICITORS: Sattler & Associates
FIRST RESPONDENT: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: M G Craig QC and A M Pickles (barrister) SOLICITORS: Abbott Tout
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate