NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Stewart Ross Stevens v Sutherland Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 405 APPLICANT: PARTIES : Stewart Ross Stevens RESPONDENT: Sutherland Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10393 of 2004 CORAM: Watts C at 1 KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Townhouses and villas are prohibited under Draft Sutherland Local Environmental Plan 2004. (Issue 1(e)) - Bulk scale character and compatibility with "character of the neighbourhood" (Issue 1(a) (b) (c) and Issue 2) - Limiting multi-unit dwellings in each locality to be no more than 10% of all dwellings - Internal amenity for future occupants (Issue 3) - Parking. (Issue 4) - and - Points of objection raised by objectors. (Issue 5). LEGISLATION CITED: Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2000, (SSLEP) - The Development Control Plan for Townhouses and Villa Houses in 2(al) and 2(a2) Residential Zones, (DCP - TV) - Draft Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2004, (DSSLEP2004) - Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 79C and 97 CASES CITED: Novara Crescent v Sutherland Council - Smartspace v Parramatta City Council - Ciofuli v Canada Bay Council DATES OF HEARING: 08/07/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/27/2004
APPLICANT: Mr P Clay, barrister, instructed by Mr S R Stevens, owner LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr R O'Gorman-Hughes, environmental lawyer
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Watts C
27 July 2004
10393 of 2004 Stewart Ross Stevens v Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate