NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Bensen & Partner Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2003] NSWLEC 247 APPLICANT Bensen & Partner Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Woollahra Municipal Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10441 of 2003 CORAM: Nott C KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- proposed residential flat building containing three units - narrow lot - breach of development standard relating to frontage width - amenity impacts of overlooking and overshadowing LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 79C and 97 Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 1995, cll 10A and 10B Megron Developments Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2003] NSWLEC 242; CASES CITED: Mobil Oil Australia Ltd v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [No. 2] [1971] 2 NSWLR 314; Winchester City Council v Secretary of State for the Environment (1980) 39 P&CR 1 (CA) per Lord Denning MR DATES OF HEARING: 13-15 October 2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/23/2003
APPLICANT Ms S Hill (solicitor)
RESONDENT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr M Connell (solicitor) SOLICITORS Mitchell Sillar
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 10441 of 2003 Nott C
23 October 2003
Bensen & Partners Pty Ltd Applicant v
Woollahra Municipal Council Respondent
Judgment
Overview
1 This is an appeal against the council's refusal of a development application to demolish an existing two-unit residential flat building at 642 Old South Head Road, Rose Bay, and to erect a new three-unit residential flat building. Each proposed unit has a double garage facing a common driveway that runs along the southern side boundary of the site. Above the garage level, each proposed unit has two habitable floors, with three bedrooms being on the upper floor.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate