NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Nizik v Ku-ring-gai Council [2005] NSWLEC 256
APPLICANT Mark Nizik
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11274 of 2005
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Front fence - swimming pool - streetscape impact - flooding risk - safety - pollution
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act LEGISLATION CITED: Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997
CASES CITED: Gray v Fairfield CC, NSWLEC - Appeal No. 10539 of 1986 (Unreported)
DATES OF HEARING: 01/03/2005 and 09/05/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/20/2005
APPLICANT Mr G McKee, solicitor SOLICITORS McKees Legal Solutions LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Cole, solicitor SOLICITORS Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
20 May 2005
11274 of 2004 Mark Nizik v Ku-ring-gai Council
JUDGMENT
Background 1 This appeal arises out of council's refusal of a development application for a front fence and swimming pool, associated with the construction of a new two-storey residence at 19 Carlotta Avenue, Gordon.
2 These components were initially included in the overall development application, which involved the demolition of an existing dwelling and replacement with the new two-storey dwelling and ancillary works. However the property contains a natural watercourse, which results in considerable overland flows during storm events and creates flood hazards.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate