NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Boutouridis v Canterbury City Council [2004] NSWLEC 220 APPLICANT Bill Boutouridis PARTIES : RESPONDENT Canterbury City Counncil FILE NUMBER(S) : 11532 and 11533 of 2003 CORAM: Hoffman C KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Demolish an existing cottage - build two semi-detached dwellings one on each small existing lot - draft LEP provisions - front setback - common side boundary setback - character of locality - density - bulk - scale - traffic and parking. LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act Local Government Plan CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 26 and 30 March 2004 EX TEMPORE 04/02/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT Ms M L Taylor, solicitor SOLICITORS Taylor Kelso LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr A Seton, , solicitor SOLICITORS Marsdens
JUDGMENT: 1
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
11532 and 11533 of 2003 Hoffman C 2 April 2004 Bill Boutouridis Applicant
v Canterbury City Council Respondent Judgment
1. This was a class 1 appeal Nos. 11532 and 11533 of 2003 between B Boutouridis and Canterbury City Council in regard to the refusal of an application to demolish an existing cottage straddling two lots of land and build two semi-detached dwellings at 48 and 48A Woolcott Street, Earlwood. Lot 8 was No. 48A and appeal 11533 related to it. Appeal 11532 related to No. 48 being Lot 7.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate