NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Kim v Council of the City of Sydney [2006] NSWLEC 799
APPLICANT J Y Kim PARTIES : RESPONDENT Council of the City of Sydney
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10647 of 2006
CORAM: Moore C
Development Application :- KEY ISSUES: Brothel Anti-clustering provisions of DCP
Rosawan Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2005] NSWLEC 630; Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373; CASES CITED: Martyn v Hornsby Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 614; City of Sydney Council v De Cue Pty Ltd [2006] NSWLEC 763; Stockland Development Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2004] NSWLEC 472
DATES OF HEARING: 23 November 2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/22/2006
APPLICANT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr P Larkin, barrister INSTRUCTED BY Spiegel & Associates
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE C
22 December 2006
06/10647 J Y Kim v Council of the City of Sydney
JUDGMENT 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the Act) against the refusal by the Council of the City of Sydney (the council) of Development Application D/2006/661 to permit commercial premises at 134 Abercrombie Street, Chippendale (the site) to be used for the purposes of a brothel. The site, although with a street address of Abercrombie Street (a busy arterial road), is in fact entered from Cleveland Street, another busy arterial road.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate