NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Canterbury City Council v Daoud [2007] NSWLEC 135
PROSECUTOR: Canterbury City Council PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Robert Daoud
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50033 of 2006
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- commencing erection of a buidling in accordance with development consent when construction certificate had not been issued, contrary to s 81A(2)(a) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - plea of guilty - objective, subjective and mitigating circumstances.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 125(1), 81A(2)(a), s 81A(7), s 109D(1)(b) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s 10, ss 21A and 22
Byres v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 82; Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683 at 698; Carlino v Leichhardt Council (2005) 144 LGERA 235; City of Sydney Council v Gravity Corporation Pty Limited [2001] NSWLEC 219; Environmental Protection Authority v Hochtief AG [2006] NSWLEC 200; CASES CITED: Fairfield City Council v Cavasinni Constructions Pty Limited [2005] NSWLEC 187; Gittany Constructions Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council (2006) 145 LGERA 189; Holroyd City Council v Katia Abouantoun & Anor [2003] NSWLEC 379; Hornsby Shire Council v Symon [2003] NSWLEC 410; North Sydney Council v Littlemore 132 LGERA 116; North Sydney Council v Serafina (aka Phillip) Bianco [2005] NSWLEC 652 ; R v Thompson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate