NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Cuzeno v Hurstville City Council [2005] NSWLEC 189
Applicant: Cuzeno Pty Ltd PARTIES : Respondent: Hurstville City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11539 of 2004
CORAM: Roseth SC
KEY ISSUES: Development Application - Development Control Plan - Development Standards :-
DATES OF HEARING: 12/04/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/22/2005
Applicant: Mr M Ball
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
Respondent: Mr P Rigg, solicitor of Deacons Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Roseth SC
22 April 2005
11539 of 2004 Cuzeno Pty Ltd v Hurstville City Council
JUDGMENT 1 Senior Commissioner: This is an appeal against the refusal by Hurstville Council (the council) of a development application to demolish the existing buildings and erect a residential/commercial development on lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 DP 19301, lot 134 DP 12807 and lot 2 DP 13146, known as 166-178 Stoney Creek Road, Beverly Hills.
The site 2 The site is near the corner of Stoney Creek Road and King Georges Road. It has an area of 3,124m2 and frontages to Stoney Creek Road and Lee Avenue. It now accommodates two single-storey retail buildings and a large vacant area formerly used as a service station. 3 To the south, across Stoney Creek Road, is the Beverly Hills Public School. To the north are residential properties on Lee Avenue and Beresford Avenue. To the west and northwest is the Beverly Hills commercial precinct.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate