NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Progress and Securities v Burwood Council [2006] NSWLEC 706
Applicant: Progress and Securities Building Pty Ltd
PARTIES : First Respondent: Burwood Council
Second Respondent: Railcorp
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10238 of 2006
CORAM: Roseth SC
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Drainage easment, terms of easment, Newbury test for conditions of consent
Conveyancing Act 1919 s88K LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s40 Rail Safety Act 2002 Transport Administration Act 1988
Antipas v Kutcher [2006] 144 LGRA 289; Beeton v Minister for Infrastructure Planning and Natural Resources [2005] NSWLEC 197; CASES CITED: Cameron North Sydney Investments v Strata Plan 50411 [2002] NSWSC 726; Kirkjin v Towers, unreported 6 July 1987; Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC578; Patrial Holdings v Short [1994] NSW Conv R 55-7 11, and on appeal [1994] 6BPR 13,996 at 14,003
DATES OF HEARING: 25/10/2006 and 03/11/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/13/2006
Applicant: Mr J Webster SC and Mr P Clay instructed by Ms S Emery of Emery Law Firm First Respondent: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr T Robertson SC instructed by Mr S Simmington of Phillip Fox
Second Respondent: Mr P Larkin, barrister instructed by Ms R Daniel of Clayton Utz
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate