Nuova Surry Hills v Sydney City Council [2004] NSWLEC 335
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION : Nuova Surry Hills v Sydney City Council [2004] NSWLEC 335
APPLICANT
Nuova Surry Hills
PARTIES :
RESPONDENT
Sydney City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11316 of 2003
CORAM: Talbot J
KEY ISSUES: :-
LEGISLATION CITED:
CASES CITED:
DATES OF HEARING: 07/06/2004, 08/06/2004
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/08/2004
APPLICANT
Mr C McEwen (Barrister)
SOLICITORS
Staunton Beattie
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT
Mr J Robson (Barrister)
SOLICITORS
Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
11316 of 2003
Talbot J
8 June 2004
Nuova Surry Hills Pty Limited
Applicant
v
Sydney City Council
Respondent
Judgment
Introduction
1 HIS HONOUR: With considerable assistance from my associate and also with the benefit of advice from Commissioner Moore, I have been able to reach a decision and even to put the decision into a written form. I am confident that we have picked up any inherent clerical mistakes. If we have not that will come out in a revised edition but for the moment you can assume that this covers all of the matters that we intended to cover. Having considered both the written and oral evidence, the view of the site and submissions made on behalf of the respective parties, I have concluded that the overall level of amenity of the proposed development is unacceptable for the reasons that I set out in the judgment. Accordingly, the orders of the Court are that the appeal is dismissed. The development application, which I describe in the second order, is determined by the refusal of development consent and the exhibits may be returned. I publish the reasons and a copy will be available to you immediately. It may just take a few moments for the exhibits to be assembled for re-delivery but my associate will have them available to you in a short time.
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.