NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 120 LGERA 433
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Todbern Pty Limited v Hurstville City Council and Anor. (No. 2) [2002] NSWLEC 86 APPLICANT: Todbern Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENTS: Hurstville City Council and Anor. FILE NUMBER(S) : 20071 of 1999 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- Section 56A Appeal-Whether Commissioner failed to consider Applicant's case in support of objection-Whether sufficient reasons given for decision LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 56A Local Government Act 1993 s 82 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139; Beale v Government Insurance Office of NSW (1997) 48 NSWLR 430; Brimbella Pty Ltd v Mosman Municipal Council (1985) 79 LGERA 367; Colin Graham and Partners Pty Ltd v The Council of the Shire of Great Lakes (Court of Appeal-unreported 6 May 1982); Fast Bucks$ v Byron Shire Council (1999) 103 LGERA 94; Martin and Spork Pty Ltd v South Sydney City Council (1999) 103 LGERA 213; CASES CITED: McPhee v S Bennett Ltd (1934) 52 WN (NSW); Saxer v North Sydney Municipal Council (1988) 64 LGRA 203; Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247; Todbern Pty Ltd v Hurstville City Council (2001) NSWLEC 145; Wall v Great Lakes Shire Council (1986) 59 LGRA 127; Westport Marina Developments Pty Ltd v Concord Council (2000) 109 LGERA 451; Woollahra Municipal Council v TAJJ Investments Pty Limited (1982) 49 LGRA 123 DATES OF HEARING: 15 May 2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/28/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate