NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Mitchell Group Pty Limited v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 113 APPLICANT Mitchell Group Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Baulkham Hills Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10219 of 2004 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Jurisdiction :- effect of "stop the clock" provisions Appeal :- whether regulation postponing right to appeal engaged Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 153 LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 s 160 Interpretation Act 1987 s 76 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cl 54(2), cl 54(5), cl 106, cl 107, cl 109(1), cl 109(2), cl 113(1) CASES CITED: Gee v Port Stephens Council [2003] NSWLEC 260, unreported; Security, Department of Social Security v Garratt (1992) 16 AAR 223; 109 ALR 149 DATES OF HEARING: 25/03/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/31/2004
APPLICANT Mr T F Robertson SC with Ms L Byrne (Barrister) SOLICITORS NA LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr C T Drury (Solicitor) SOLICITORS Phillips Fox
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 10219 of 2004
Talbot J
31 March 2004 Mitchell Group Pty Limited Applicant v Baulkham Hills Shire Council Respondent Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate