NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Markev Investments Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 88 revised - 3/06/2004 APPLICANT Markev Investments Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sutherland Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10139 of 2003 CORAM: Hussey C Development Application :- Mixed use residential/parking development - appropriatness of development - design elements - orderly development KEY ISSUES: Principles - Mixed use residential amentiy - Orderly development LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy No. 65 Sutherland Shire LEP 2000 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 04-06/08/2003, 17/11/2003 and 20/02/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/19/2004
APPLICANT Mr G Newport, barrister
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Cole, solicitor SOLICITORS Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
10139 of 2003
Hussey C
19 March 2004
Markev Investments Pty Limited Applicant v
Sutherland Shire Council Respondent
Background
1 . This appeal is against council's refusal of a development application for alterations to an existing hotel development and construction of an associated residential flat building (RFB) in the Engadine town centre. The Engadine Hotel has been in existence for many years and has progressively acquired additional surrounding landholdings. In 1994, consent was granted for the refurbishment, additions and carparking upgrade for the hotel.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate