Randwick City Council v Athens and Anor (No 3) [2004] NSWLEC 49
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION : Randwick City Council v Athens and Anor (No 3) [2004] NSWLEC 49
APPLICANT
Randwick City Council
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT
Peta Athens
SECOND RESPONDENT
Athens Holdings Pty Limited (ACN 001 166 552)
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40097 of 2000
CORAM: Cowdroy J
KEY ISSUES: Contempt :- obligation to evidence - objection overruled.
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995, s 136
CASES CITED:
DATES OF HEARING: 28/01/2004; 29/01/2004; 30/01/2004
EX TEMPORE 01/30/2004
JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT
Mr A. Thompson (Barrister)
SOLICITORS
Bowen & Gerathy
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT
Mr M. Ramage QC
SOLICITORS
Levitt Robinson Solicitors and Associates
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
40097 of 2000
Cowdroy J
30 January 2004
Randwick City Council
Applicant
v
Peta Athens
First Respondent
Athens Holding Pty Limited (ACN 001 166 552)
Second Respondent
Judgment [No. 3 Interlocutory]
Introduction
1 An application has been made that the Court exclude the content of paragraph 5 of the affidavit of David Mulcahy on the basis that it may be unfairly prejudicial to the alleged contemnors.
2 The Court notes that by letter dated 14 January 2004 the solicitors for the respondents acknowledged that the affidavit of Mr David Mulcahy would be relied upon together with other affidavits. No objection was taken, nor any foreshadowed issue concerning the matter to which objection has been taken.
3 Accordingly, the Court does not consider it appropriate to accede to the request which is now made that the Court exclude it under s 136 of the Evidence Act 1995. For this reason, the application is rejected.
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.