NSW Caselaw
> Reported Decision : 129 LGERA 351
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Tipalea Watson Pty Ltd v Ku-Ring-Gai Council [2003] NSWLEC 253 APPLICANT: Tipalea Watson Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Ku-Ring-Gai Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10950 of 2003 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- modification application-whether modified development substantially the same as originally approved development LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 96(2) Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 39(2) Moto Projects (No 2) Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298; CASES CITED: North Sydney Council v Michael Standley and Associates Pty Ltd (1998) 97LGERA 433; Sydney City Council v Ilenace Pty Ltd (1984) 3 NSWLR 414; Vacik Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council (unreported 24 February 1992) Stein J DATES OF HEARING: 25/09/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/24/2003
APPLICANT: Mr P Clay, Barrister SOLICITORS McKees Legal Solutions LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr M Wright, Barrister SOLICITORS Deacons
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Matter No . . 10950 of 2003 Coram : Bignold J 24 October 2003
TIPALEA WATSON PTY LIMITED
Applicant
v
KU-RING-GAI COUNCIL
Respondent
JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate