NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Doncaster Operations v Randwick City Council (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 188
APPLICANT Doncaster Operations Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Randwick City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11535 of 2004
CORAM: Brown C
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- modification of conditions of approval for alterations and additions to a hotel - noise
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
CASES CITED: Zhang v Canterbury City Council [2001] NSWCA 167
DATES OF HEARING: 30/03/07
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 30 March 2007
APPLICANT Mr C McEwen SC SOLICITORS Staunton Beattie LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Kildea, barrister SOLICITORS Shaw Reynolds Bowen & Gerathy
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Brown C
30 March 2007
11535 of 2004 Doncaster Operations Pty Limited v Randwick City Council (No 2)
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against a condition requiring a trial period imposed by Randwick City Council (the council) on an application to modify Development Application 733/2004. This approval provided for alterations and additions to a hotel at 268 – 270 Anzac Parade Kensington (the site). The alterations and additions have been completed.
2 The modification application seeks to modify conditions 2, 9, 117, 121 and corresponding requirements in the Plan of Management. These conditions restrict the operating hours of the first floor terrace of the hotel and require a foldable screen to confine a maximum 50 patrons to a smaller section of the terrace. These conditions were imposed to ensure compliance with noise conditions of the Licensing Court.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate