NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Rockdale City Council v Rougalas [2005] NSWLEC 525
APPLICANT Rockdale City Council FIRST RESPONDENT PARTIES : Theodoras Rougalas SECOND RESPONDENT Chrissanthi Rougalas
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40624 of 2004
CORAM: Cowdroy J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- respondents substantially satisfied the claim of the applicant - quantum of costs - abortive hearings due to illness - party/party costs - impecuniosity
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 80(1)(a), s 96 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69(2) LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 15 r 7 Rockdale Local Environmental Plan 2000
Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; CASES CITED: Re the Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs of the Commonwealth of Australia; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; Save the Showground for Sydney Inc v Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning (1998) 103 LGERA 254; Tzavellas v Canterbury City Council and Anor (1999) 105 LGERA 262
DATES OF HEARING: 05/08/2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 08/05/2005
APPLICANT K Gerathy (solicitor) SOLICITORS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Abbott Tout
RESPONDENT H Nicolaou (agent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate