NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hird v Blue Mountains City Council [2005] NSWLEC 329
APPLICANT Mr and Mrs Hird PARTIES : RESPONDENT Blue Mountains City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10832 of 2004
CORAM: Tuor C.
Development Application :- alterations additions and adaptive re-use of heritage item Heritage Incentives Clause Whether conservation plan required KEY ISSUES: Impact on heritage significance Whether item most appropriately conserved by the use of the proposed development Impact on residential amenity - traffic and parking noise and privacy
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Blue Mountains Local Environmental Plan 4 Draft Blue Mountains local Environmental Plan 2002
CASES CITED: Hilley v Blue Mountains Council [2004] NSWLEC 412
DATES OF HEARING: 06 & 07/12/ 2004 and 24/02/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/20/2005
APPLICANT Mr C Drury SOLICITORS Phillips Fox LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr A Seton SOLICITORS Marsdens
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Tuor C
20 June 2005
10832 of 2004 Hird v Blue Mountains City Council
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate