NSW Caselaw
> Reported Decision : 124 LGERA 262
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Todbern Pty Limited v Hurstville City Council and Anor. [2003] NSWLEC 11 APPLICANT: Todbern Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENTS Hurstville City Council and Anor. FILE NUMBER(S) : (4)0258 of 2002 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Building Approval :- Declarations-extension of building approval LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1993, ss 103 and 107 Environmental Planning and Assessment (Savings and Transitional) Regulation 1998, cl 38 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 26/09/02, 27/09/02 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 09/27/2002
APPLICANT: Mr J Ayling SC
SOLICITORS: Carneys
FIRST REPONDENT: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr P Rigg, Solicitor SECOND RESPONDENT: Mr A Pickles, Barrister
SOLICITORS: FIRST RESPONDENT: Deacons SECOND RESPONDENT: Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Matter No . (4) 0258 of 2002 Coram : Bignold J. 27 September 2002 TODBERN PTY LIMITED
Applicant
v
HURSTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
First Respondent
KOGARAH COUNCIL
Second Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. These class 4 proceedings were commenced on 14 June 2002 whereby the Applicant, being the lessee of a large commercial structure erected over Hurstville railway station upon which has been established for many decades a shopping centre, claims a declaration that the Applicant has substantially, physically, commenced work pursuant to building approval BA 2015/99 on or about 22 February 2002.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate