NSW Caselaw
Set aside by Appeal : [2003] NSWCA 343
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Westfield And Anor. v The Registrar-General [2002] NSWLEC 248 APPLICANTS: Westfield And Anor. PARTIES : RESPONDENT: The Registrar-General FILE NUMBER(S) : 30008 of 2002 of 2002 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- boundaries-determination of common boundary by Registrar General-appeal to Court LEGISLATION CITED: Real Property Act 1900, s 135J CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 16, 17, 18/09/02 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/23/2002
APPLICANTS: Mr R Dalgleish, Barrister with Ms C Ravenscroft, Barrister SOLICITORS N/A LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr P Walsh, Barrister SOLICITORS Solicitor for the Registrar General
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Matter No . 30008 of 2002 Coram : Bignold J 23 December 2002
M AND A WESTFIELD
Applicants
v
THE REGISTRAR-GENERAL
JUDGMENT
Bignold J: A. INTRODUCTION
1. This is an appeal pursuant to the Real Property Act 1900, s 135J (the RP Act) by the Applicants (being the co-owners of a residential property known as No 35 Kangaroo Street, Manly) who are dissatisfied with a determination made by the Respondent of the position of the northern boundary of their property (being the common boundary with the adjoining property known as No 37 Kangaroo Street) as notified to the Applicants in the Respondent's letter given to the Applicants on 15 January 2002.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate