NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Williams v Homestake Australia Limited And Ors. [2003] NSWLEC 250 APPLICANT: Williams PARTIES : RESPONDENTS: Homestake Australia Limited And Ors. FILE NUMBER(S) : 40010 of 2002 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- setting aside subpoena LEGISLATION CITED: CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 19/03/2002 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 03/19/2002
APPLICANT: Mr A Oshlack, Agent SOLICITORS N/A LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr C Ireland, Solicitor SOLICITORS Blake Dawson Waldron
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 40010 of 2002 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram: Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 19 March 2002
N. WILLIAMS
Applicant
v
HOMESTAKE AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 007 857
First Respondent
BARRICK CORPORATION
Second Respondent
THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Third Respondent
JUDGMENT
Bignold J:
1. The Court has before it a Notice of Motion filed on 12 March 2002 by the Applicant in class four proceedings seeking a number of orders in relation to a subpoena for production served by the first respondent upon Mr Alan Oshlack who acts as the authorised agent of the Applicant in class four proceedings brought by the Applicant against the first respondent and others seeking declaratory and injunctive relief in respect of exploratory mining activities being conducted by the first respondent on land known as the Lake Cowal Gold mine site.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate