NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Lang v Pittwater Council [2006] NSWLEC 474
APPLICANT Anthony Lang and Ursula Lang PARTIES : RESPONDENT Pittwater Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10195 of 2006
CORAM: Brown C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- subdivision - minimum lot size - loss of trees - character
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 Pittwater Local Environmental Plan 2001 State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1
Winten Property Group Limited v North Sydney Council (2001) NSWLEC 46; CASES CITED: Hooker Corporation Pty Limited v Hornsby Shire Council (unreported, 2 June 1986) ; Parrott v Kiama [2004] NSWLEC 77
DATES OF HEARING: 27, 28/07/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/03/2006
APPLICANT Mr C Shaw, solicitor SOLICITORS Shaw Reynolds Lawyers
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms H Irish, barrister SOLICITORS Mallesons Stephen Jaques
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Brown C
3 August 2006
10195 of 2006 Anthony Lang and Ursula Lang v Pittwater Council
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal by Pittwater Council (the council) of DA No N0171/04 for the subdivision of the property at 45 Riverview Rd, Avalon (the site) into two lots. The site and surrounding area 2 The site is Lot 4 in DP 17910 and has a frontage to Paradise Ave and Riverview Rd. It is generally rectangular in shape with a frontage to Paradise Ave of 15.775 metres, a frontage to Riverview Rd of 15.24 metres, a northern boundary of 81.46 metres and a southern boundary of 77.42 metres giving a total site area of 1210.7 square metres.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate