NSW Caselaw
Set aside by Appeal : [2007] NSWCA 164
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2006] NSWLEC 468
APPLICANT Castle Constructions Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT North Sydney Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11010 of 2005
CORAM: Talbot J
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- error in relation to SEPP 1 objection and failure to consider relevant critical matters.
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2001 State Environmental Planning Policy 1 - Devlopment Standards State Envrionmental Planning Policy 65 - Design Quality of Residential Flat Development
Currey v Sutherland Shire Council (1998) 100 LGERA 365; Great Wall Property Group Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2005] NSWLEC 574; King v Great Lakes Shire Council (1986) 58 LGRA 366; CASES CITED: Parramatta City Council v Hale (1982) 47 LGRA 319; Purcell v Electricity Commission of NSW (1985) 60 ALR 652; RTA v Damjanovic [2006] NSWCA 166; Weal v Bathurst City Council (2000) 111 LGERA 181 ; Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 51 NSWLR 589
DATES OF HEARING: 20/06/2006, 21/06/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/03/2006
APPLICANT Mr T F Robertson SC SOLICITORS Aitken McLachlan Thorpe LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr M G Craig QC with Ms H P Irish (barrister) SOLICITORS Mallesons Stephen Jacques
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate