NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 154 LGERA 117
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Corowa v Geographe Point Pty Ltd & Anor [2007] NSWLEC 121
APPLICANT Robert Corowa
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Geographe Point Pty Ltd
SECOND RESPONDENT Tweed Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 41042 of 2006
CORAM: Jagot J
KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review :- whether development application required to be accompanied by a species impact statement - failure to consider presence of endangered ecological community on land - operation of s 101 of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - privative clause - validity of construction certificate - inconsistency with development consent - manifest unreasonableness - breach of development consent - clearing of endangered ecological community
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Pt 4A, s 4(1), s 5A, s 76A(1)(b), s 78A(8)(b), s 79C(1), s 80(12), s 81A(5), s 94, s 101, s 109C(1)(b), s 112, s 124(1) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cl 145(2) Interpretation Act 1987 s 30 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 25C National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 s 118A(2), s 118D(1) Rural Fires Act 1997 s 100B State Environmental Planning Policy No 14—Coastal Wetlands Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 s 4(1), s 12, s 24
AGC (Advances) Ltd v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW (1993) 30 NSWLR 391; Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1; BT Goldsmith Planning Services Pty Limited v Blacktown City Council [2005] NSWLEC 210; Carstens v Pittwater Council (1999) 111 LGERA 1; Currey v Sutherland Shire Council (2003) 129 LGERA 223; Helman v Byron Shire Council and Another (1995) 87 LGERA 349; Kindimindi Investments Pty Ltd v Lane Cove Council and Another (2006) 143 LGERA 277; Lesnewski v Mosman Municipal Council (2005) 138 LGERA 207; Maitland City Council v Anambah Homes Pty Ltd (2005) 64 NSWLR 695; Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; Marnal Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council (1989) 68 LGRA 135; Maule v Liporoni and Another (2002) 122 LGERA 140; Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Another v Peko-Wallsend Limited and Others (1986) 162 CLR 24; Minister for Local Government and Another v South Sydney City Council (2002) 55 NSWLR 381; Oshlack v Richmond River Shire Council and Another (1993) 82 LGERA 222; CASES CITED: O'Toole v Charles David Proprietary Limited (1990) 171 CLR 232; Parramatta City Council and Another v Hale and Others (1982) 47 LGRA 319; Plumb v Penrith City Council and Anor [2002] NSWLEC 223; Project Blue Sky Inc and Others v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; R v Hickman and Others; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598; R v Murray and Others; Ex Parte Proctor and Others (1949) 77 CLR 387; Rundle v Tweed Shire Council and Another (1989) 68 LGRA 308; Ryde Municipal Council v The Royal Ryde Homes and Another (1970) 19 LGRA 321; Smyth v Nambucca Shire Council and Another (1999) 105 LGERA 65; Sofi v Wollondilly Shire Council and Another [1975] 2 NSWLR 614; Somerville v Dalby and Others (1990) 69 LGRA 422; The Dubler Group Pty Ltd v Minister for Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources (2004) 137 LGERA 178; Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL and Others (1999) 46 NSWLR 55; Westfield Management Limited v Perpetual Trustee Company Limited & Anor [2006] NSWCA 245; Woolworths Limited and Another v Bathurst City Council and Another (1987) 63 LGRA 55; Woolworths Ltd v Pallas Newco Pty Ltd and Another (2004) 61 NSWLR 707
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate