NSW Caselaw
> Reported Decision : 126 LGERA 299
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Markev Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council [2003] NSWLEC 138 APPLICANT: Markev Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Sutherland Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10139 of 2003 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- whether development permissible in terms of LEP-meaning of "residential flats only in building subject to another permitted use" LEGISLATION CITED: Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2000 Canterbury Municipal Council v Wallspace Advertising (Australia) Pty Ltd (1982) 47 LGRA 135 at 138; Food Plus Pty Ltd v Warringah Shire Council (1983) 50 LGRA 76; CASES CITED: Solicitor General v Foodbarn Pty Ltd (1975) 32 LGRA 157; Warringah Shire Council v Caltex Oil (Aust) Pty Ltd (1989) 68 LGRA 206; Warringah Shire Council v Raffles (1978) 38 LGRA 306 DATES OF HEARING: 03/06/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/12/2003
APPLICANT: Mr G Newport, Barrister SOLICITORS Payne Pacific Real Estate (Agent) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr J Cole, Solicitor SOLICITORS Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Matter No . . 10139 of 2003 Coram : Bignold J 12 June 2003
MARKEV PTY LIMITED
Applicant
v
SUTHERLAND SHIRE COUNCIL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate