NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Armytage & Ors v Sutherland Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 94
APPLICANTS: Murray Armytage Linda Armytage Adam Hodges PARTIES : Tammie Hodges
RESPONDENT: Sutherland Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11272 of 2004
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- development application for subdivision - compliance with planning instruments - whether subdivision conforms with existing subdivision pattern
Conveyancing Act 1919 Sch 8(1) Draft Sutherland Shire Local Environment Plan 2004 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 97 LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1993 s 458 State Environmental Planning Policy 1 Sutherland Shire Local Environment Plan 2000 Sutherland Shire Residential Subdivision Development Control Plan 2001
Stockland Development Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2004] NSWLEC 472; CASES CITED: Tenacity Consulting v Warringah [2004] NSWLEC 140; Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373
11/02/2005 DATES OF HEARING: 14/02/2005 17/02/2005 18/02/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/17/2005
APPLICANTS: Mr P Rigg (solicitor) SOLICITORS: Deacons LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr R O'Gorman Hughes (solicitor) SOLICITORS: Sutherland Shire Council
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate