NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 160 LGERA 115
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Garrett v Dennis Charles Williams [2006] NSWLEC 785 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
PROSECUTOR Stephen Garrett PARTIES : DEFENDANT Dennis Charles Williams
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50053; 50056 of 2005
CORAM: Preston CJ
KEY ISSUES: Environmental Offences :- pick endangered ecological community - sentencing - objective seriousness of offence - substantial environmental harm - premeditated and deliberate conduct - done for commercial reasons of proposed development - series of acts - mitigating circumstances - late plea of guilty - no prior convictions - prior good character
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 3A(a), (b), (e)-(g), s 5(1), s 21A(2)(g), s 21A(2)(m), s 21A(3)(e),(f),(k), s 22 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 s 253(2) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 5A, s 149 LEGISLATION CITED: Fines Act 1996 s 6 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW) s 118A(2) National Parks and Wildlife Amendment Act 2001 sch 3 item [27] Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995
Axer Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 113 LGERA 357; Bentley v BGP Properties Pty Ltd (2006) 145 LGERA 234; Cameron v Eurobodalla Shire Council (2006) 146 LGERA 349; Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Limited v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683; Dempsey v R [2002] QCA 45 (22 February 2002); Director-General National Parks and Wildlife Service v Wilkinson [2002] NSWLEC 71 (27 September 2002); Environment Protection Authority v Australian Waste Recyclers 1 Pty Ltd [2005] NSWLEC 739 (22 December 2005); Environment Protection Authority v Barnes [2006] NSWCCA 246 (17 August 2006); Environment Protection Authority v Gardner [1997] NSWLEC 169 (7 November 1997); Environment Protection Authority v Waste Recycling and Processing Corporation [2006] NSWLEC 419 (10 July 2006); Gittany Constructions Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 242 (10 May 2006); Markarian v The Queen (2005) 79 ALJR 1048; Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59; Pearce v The Queen (1988) 194 CLR 610; Piva v Brinkworth (1992) 59 SASR 92; R v Anglian Water Services Ltd [2004] 1 Cr App R(S) 62, [2004] JPL 458; CASES CITED: R v Bata Industries Ltd (1992) 92 OR (3d) 329, 7 CELR (NS) 245; R v Elfar [2003] NSWCCA 358 (2 December 2003); R v F Howe & Son [1999] 2 All ER 249; R v Kalache (2000) 111 A Crim R 152; R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242 (11 August 2006); R v Milford Haven Port Authority [2000] JPL 943; R v Morabito (1992) 62 A Crim R 82; R v Peel [1971] 1 NSWLR 247; R v Power [1999] NSWCCA 25 (5 March 1999); R v Sutton [2004] NSWCCA 225 (6 July 2004); R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; R v Wheeler [2000] NSWCCA 34 (16 February 2000); R v Winchester (1992) 58 A Crim R 345; R v Yorkshire Water Services Ltd [2002] 2 Cr App R(S) 13, [2002] Env LR 18; Regina v A [999] NSWCCA 61 (30 March 1999); State Pollution Control Commission v T J Bryant Pty Ltd [1991] NSWLEC 70 (11 June 1991); Veen v R (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; Walker v Eves (1976) 13 SASR 92
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate