NSW Caselaw
Pending Appeal :
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Gosford City Council v Brand, G C [2006] NSWLEC 422
PROSECUTOR Gosford City Council PARTIES : DEFENDANT George Charles Brand
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50013 of 2005
CORAM: Talbot J
KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- application to amend summons. Evidence:- admissibility of confidential communications.
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 96A, 125 LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995, ss 126A, 126B, 135, 136, 138 Gosford Interim Development Order No. 122
Anthony John Tauszik v Gosford City Council [2006] NSWCCA 193; Woollahra Council v Dutruc Pty Ltd (1997) 95 A Crim R 344; Broome v Chenoweth (1946) 73 CLR 583; Traveland v Doherty (1982) 63 FLR 41; Ex parte Parkinson (1909) 26 WN(NSW) 7; McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (No 2) (2002) 54 NSWLR 39; CASES CITED: Cahapatative v R (2004) 146 A Crim R 542; R v Bartelesi (1997) 41 NSWLR 641; Wehbee v Voulgarakis (1991) noted at 9 Petty Sessions Review 4363; Ex parte Lovell; Re Buckley (1938) SR(NSW) 153; Hornsby Shire Council v Clyne (1998) 99 LGERA 432; Hornsby Shire Council v Winsloe (1998) 101 LGERA 117; A & Ors v Hayden & Ors (1984) 156 CLR 532
DATES OF HEARING: 18/04/2006, 19/04/2006, 20/04/2006, 01/05/2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate