NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2004) 135 LGERA 421
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Anambah Homes Pty Limited v Maitland City Council [2004] NSWLEC 615 APPLICANT: PARTIES : Anambah Homes Pty Limited RESPONDENT: Maitland City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 41296 of 2004 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review :- validity of consent conditions - application of s 101 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - Hickman principles LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 94, s 94B, s 96, s 101 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Kingsway Investments (Kent) Ltd v Kent County Council [1969] 2 QB 332; Londish v Knox Grammar School (1997) 97 LGERA 1; Mitchforce Pty Ltd v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW (2003) 57 NSWLR 212; CASES CITED: Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476; R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598; Sericott v Snowy River Council (1999) 108 LGERA 66; Woolworths Limited and Kenlida Pty Limited v Bathurst City Council and Austcorp No 71 Pty Limited (1987) 63 LGRA 55; Woolworths Ltd v Pallas Newco Pty Ltd & Anor [2004] NSWCA 422 DATES OF HEARING: 27/10/2004 28/10/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/13/2004
APPLICANT: Mr A. Galasso instructed by Carroll and O'Dea LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr T. S. Hale SC with Mr J. Kildea instructed by Thompson Norrie Solicitors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate