NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Regent Street Constructions Pty Limited v Ku-ring-gai Council [2006] NSWLEC 743
APPLICANT: PARTIES : Regent Street Constructions Pty Limited RESPONDENT: Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10742-3 of 2006
CORAM: Watts C at 1
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Heritage significance and whether the buildings should be retained
Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance, (KPSO) Ku-ring-gai Dual Occupancy Code, (Code) Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan No 31 – Access, (DCP31) LEGISLATION CITED: Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan No 43 – Car Parking, (DCP 43) Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan No 47 – Water Management, (DCP47) Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan No 56 –Notification Policy, (DCP56) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss79C and 97
North Western Surveys v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 666; CASES CITED: Toon v Ku-ring-gai Council [2004] NSWLEC 173; Tova v Parramatta City Council [2004] NSWLEC 282; Wolff Architecture Pty Limited and Dempsey Constructions Pty Limited v Ku ring gai Council Appeals No 10833, 11017, 11096 of 1999
DATES OF HEARING: 21/11/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/30/2006
APPLICANT: Mr F C Corsaro, SC, with Mr W Chaffey, solicitor SOLICITORS: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Wordsworth Lawyers RESPONDENT: Mr A Hudson, solicitor SOLICITORS: Wilshire Webb
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate