NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Andrew Thomas V Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 388
APPLICANT Andrew Thomas PARTIES : RESPONDENT Baulkham Hills Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10020 of 2006
CORAM: Brown C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- alterations and additions to an existing hotel - noise - amenity impacts
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Baulkham Hills Local Environmental Plan 2005
DATES OF HEARING: 24, 25/05/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/26/2006
APPLICANT Mr C Mc Ewen SC SOLICITORS Gadens Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr M Pearce, solicitor SOLICITORS Baulkham Hills Shire Council
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Brown C
26 May 2006
11384 of 2005 Andrew Thomas V Parramatta City Council 10020 of 2006 Andrew Thomas V Baulkham Hills Shire Council
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: The appeals relate to alterations and additions to an existing hotel located on the corner of Caroline Chisholm Drive and Junction Road, Winston Hills. Because the site spans the local government areas of Parramatta City Council and Baulkham Hills Shire Council, separate development applications were submitted to each council. After consideration, each council refused their respective development applications. The councils agreed that the appeals should be heard concurrently.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate