NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Dixon v Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council [2004] NSWLEC 672 APPLICANT Stephen and Katrina Dixon PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10996 of 2004 CORAM: Hoffman C KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- demolition of exisitng dwelling and construction of two dwellings as detached dual occupancies - Streetscape - Designs had features not in sympathy with street character - Shadows - Solar access - Privacy - Landscape
State Environmental Policy No. 53 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 30/11/2004 EX TEMPORE 11/30/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT Mr S. Kondilios, solicitor Maddocks
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P. Rigg, solicitor Deacons
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hoffman C
30 November 2004
10996 of 2004 Stephen and Katrina Dixon v Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is a judgment in Appeal No. 10996 of 2004 between S and K Dixon v Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council. The appeal was against a deemed refusal of development application 1058/03 for demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of two dwellings as detached dual occupancies under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 53.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate