NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Litting v Hunters Hill Council [2005] NSWLEC 636
Applicant: Ken Litting PARTIES : Respondent: Hunters Hill Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10228 of 2005
CORAM: Roseth SC
Development Application :- impact on censervation area KEY ISSUES: impact on neighbours
DATES OF HEARING: 16/09/2005 and 09/11/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/10/2005
Applicant: Mr C Gough, solicitor of Storey & Gough LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent: Mr G Riley, solicitor of Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Roseth SC
10 November 2005
10228 of 2005 Ken Litting & Associates Pty Ltd v Hunters Hill Council
JUDGMENT 1 Senior Commissioner: This is an appeal against the deemed refusal by Hunters Hill Council (the council) of a development application to demolish the existing house and erect a new dwelling house on lot 71 DP 7431, known as 18 Sunnyside Street, Gladesville. While at the beginning of the hearing on 16 September 2005 the parties were at issue, by its end they had reached agreement and sought consent orders.
The site 2 The site is on the western side of Sunnyside Crescent. It is rectangular, with a frontage of 12m and a depth of 50m, and an area of 613m2. There is a fall of 4.5m from the northwest to the southeast corner. The front of the site is 400mm above footpath level. 3 The locality is a heritage conservation area, characterised by single-storey brick cottages built in the early 1900s. Nos 2-16 and 20-52 have been identified as contributory buildings. Several houses in the area have had upper floor additions. No 16, owned by Mr S Weaver and Ms D Slack, is a partly two-storey house to the south of the subject site.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate