NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council v Ebeid [2003] NSWLEC 139 PROSECUTOR Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council PARTIES : DEFENDANT Michael Maged Ebeid FILE NUMBER(S) : 50015 of 2003 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- application to strike out class 5 proceedings - whether charge is bound to fail - issues of fact and law arising LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 76A(1), 96(2)(a), s 125(1) Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1948-1949) 78 CLR 62; General Steel Industries Inc. v Commissioner For Railways (NSW) and Ors (1964) 112 CLR 125; Jago v The District Court of New South Wales and Others (1989) 168 CLR 23; CASES CITED: Logwon Pty Limited v Warringah Shire Council (1993) 33 NSWLR 13; Rogers v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 251; Tynan and Others v Meharg and Newcastle City Council (1998) 101 LGERA 255; Walton v Gardiner; Walton v Herron; Walton v Gill (1992-1993) 177 CLR 378; Woolmington v The Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 DATES OF HEARING: 12/06/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/19/2003
PROSECUTOR Mr M. Wright (Barrister)
SOLICITORS Deacons Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT Mr P. Clay (Barrister)
SOLICITORS McKees Solicitors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate