NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Stamford Property Services Pty Ltd v The Council of the City of Sydney [2002] NSWLEC 8 APPLICANT: Stamford Property Services Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: The Council of the City of Sydney FILE NUMBER(S) : 10699 of 2001 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Development appeal-Converting serviced apartments to residential apartments-SEPP No 1 objection in respect of maximum floor space ratio-non-compliance with DCP requirements LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 97Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973, s 7(2A) CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 14 and 15 January 2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/01/2002
APPLICANT: Mr M Tobias, QC with Mr Parry, Barrister SOLICITORS Mallesons Stephen Jaques LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr D Miller, Barrister SOLICITORS Pricewaterhouse Coopers Legal
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 10699 of 2001 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram: Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 1 February 2002
STAMFORD PROPERTY SERVICES PTY LTD
Applicant
v
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SYDNEY
Respondent
JUDGMENT
Bignold J: A. INTRODUCTION
1. This is an appeal pursuant to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the EP&A Act) s 97 against the deemed refusal by the Council of the Applicant's development application to convert the use of 143 serviced apartments situate on levels 1 to 8 inclusive of an existing building situate at Nos 167-187 Kent Street Sydney and known as the "Stamford Plaza Hotel" into 128 residential apartments. (In its original form, the application proposed the conversion of the use of the 143 serviced apartments into use as residential apartments of the same number of units. However, following consultation with the Council, the application was amended to reduce the number of proposed residential apartments by combining a number of adjoining existing serviced apartments to form larger apartments resulting in the reduction of units from 143 to 128).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate