NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hornsby Shire Council v Gallagher [2003] NSWLEC 109 APPLICANT: Hornsby Shire Council PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Michael Patrick Gallagher FILE NUMBER(S) : 40763 of 2002 CORAM: Lloyd J KEY ISSUES: Injunctions and Declarations :- declaratory orders - relief - unlawful erection of temporary structure on land LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1993 s 68(1) CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 01/04/2003 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 04/01/2003
APPLICANT: Mr P M Jackson (solicitor) SOLICITORS: Pike Pike & Fenwick LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: In person SOLICITORS: N/A
JUDGMENT: - 2 - IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 40763 of 2002
Lloyd J
1 April 2003 HORNSBY SHIRE COUNCIL Applicant v MICHAEL PATRICK GALLAGHER Respondent EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT HIS HONOUR: 1 In this case the applicant, Hornsby Shire Council ("the council"), seeks relief by way of declaration and injunction in relation to a breach of s 68(1) of the Local Government Act 1993. 2 The evidence established that on four days, namely 26 September 2002, 28 September 2002, 14 October 2002 and 21 October 2002 the respondent, Mr M P Gallagher, participated in the erection of a tent on land known as Hornsby Mall at Florence Street, Hornsby. 3 A tent is a temporary structure as defined in the dictionary to the Local Government Act 1993. Section 68(1) of that Act provides: 68 What activities, generally, require the approval of the council? (1) A person may carry out an activity specified in the following Table only with the prior approval of the council, except in so far as this Act, the regulations or a local policy adopted under Part 3 allows the activity to be carried out without that approval. 4 Part A of the table to s 68 is headed "Structures or places of public entertainment" and relevantly includes item 2: "[i]nstall a temporary structure on land". 5 The evidence also shows that the respondent, Mr M P Gallagher, erected a tent, or at least participated in the erection of a tent, on 24 October 2002 and 26 October 2002, in addition to the dates noted above. 6 There is no reason to doubt any of that evidence. The evidence also shows that no approval has been granted by the council for the erection or installation of a tent or any other temporary structure on land known as Hornsby Mall located at Florence Street, Hornsby. 7 It follows that there being no discretionary matters put in opposition to the orders being sought, the relief claimed in paras 1, 2 and 3 of the application will be granted. 8 I should note that Mr M P Gallagher appeared and represented himself assisted by a "McKenzie friend", Mr M McClure. During the course of his cross-examination the respondent, Mr M P Gallagher, decided to no longer participate in the proceedings and walked out. I note that as a consequence nothing has been put to me in opposition to the orders now sought. 9 The formal orders of the Court are as set out in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the Class 4 application.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate