NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 135 LGERA 359
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Lesnewski v Mosman Municipal Council & Anor (No 2) [2004] NSWLEC 422 Helen Lesnewski PARTIES : Mosman Municipal Council Robert J Wright and Carol Wright FILE NUMBER(S) : (4)0085 of 2002 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- Whether disentitling conduct by a successful Defendant - Whether Applicant entitled to any part of her costs. LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 101 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 69(2) Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4; Maule v Liporoni & Anor [No. 2] (2002) 122 LGERA 216; CASES CITED: Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Re Sanchez (1994) 49 FCR 326; Ritter v Godfrey (1920) 2 KB 4 DATES OF HEARING: 30/07/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/02/2004
APPLICANT Mr J Webster SC SOLICITOR Hunt & Hunt
FIRST RESPONDENT Ms J Walsh LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITOR Pike Pike & Fenwick
SECOND RESPONDENT Mr J Robson SOLICITOR Freehills
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Pain J
2 August 2004
(4)0085 of 2002 HELEN LESNEWSKI Applicant
MOSMAN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate