NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Morrison v Defence Maritime Services Pty Ltd [2007] NSWLEC 118
50049 of 2005 PROSECUTOR Anthony Morrison DEFENDANT: Defence Maritime Services Pty Ltd
50048 of 2005 PROSECUTOR: PARTIES : Anthony Morrison DEFENDANT: Allen Coates
50014 of 2006 PROSECUTOR: Anthony Morrison DEFENDANT: Danny Mahon
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50048-49 of 2005; 50014 of 2006
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- three prosecutions heard together - application by prosecution, after defence cases are opened, that evidence in each proceeding be evidence in the other or that the prosecutor have leave to adduce further evidence or leave to reopen case - application refused.
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995
Bulejcik v The Queen (1996) 185 CLR 375; Bulling (Steven Shane) [1999] NSWCCA 429; Crampton v The Queen (2000) 206 CLR 161; Filipowski v Island Maritime Ltd [2006] NSWLEC 750; Filipowski v Vopak Terminals Sydney [2006] NSWLEC 104; Henning v Lynch [1974] 2 NSWLR 254; Killick v The Queen (1981) 147 CLR 565; CASES CITED: Metwally v University of Wollongong (1985) 60 ALR 6; Moss v Brown [1979] 1 NSWLR 114; Ratten v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510; R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 ; R v Payne (1949) 35 CAR 43; Shaw v The Queen (1952) 85 CLR 365; Urban Transport Authority v Nweiser (1992) 28 NSWLR 471; Weininger v The Queen (2003) 212 CLR 629
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate