NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Barker v Manly Council [2006] NSWLEC 668
APPLICANT John Barker PARTIES :
RESPONDENT Manly Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10527 of 2006
CORAM: Hoffman C
KEY ISSUES: Deemed Refusal :- Non-compliance with provisions of Residential Development Control Plan, bulk of building, privacy, removal of trees, setback of building, streetscape, car parking, height, swimming pool
Manly Local Environmental Plan 1988 LEGISLATION CITED: Manly Development Control Plan for Residential Zone 2001 Sydney Regional Environmental Plan, Sydney Harbour Catchment 2005 Residential Development Control Plan
DATES OF HEARING: 16/10/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10/16/2006
APPLICANT Mr M Staunton, solicitor SOLICITORS Staunton Beattie LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr R Graham, solicitor SOLICITORS Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hoffman C
16 October 2006
10527 of 2006 John Barker v Manly Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is a class one appeal No. 10527 of 2006 between John Barker and Manly Council in regard to the deemed refusal of an application for a new dwelling at No. 5 Sandy Bay Road, Sandy Bay, at Clontarf.
2 Whilst there is only limited weight in looking at the chronology of this matter it is useful to know that the application was preceded by development consent No. 64/04 issued by council on 13 September 2004 for the construction of alterations and additions to an existing dwelling house on the land. There was also Development Consent No. 572/03 issued by council on 4 November 2004 for the carrying out of landscape works associated with those alterations and additions.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate