NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : McIlveen v Baiada Pty Limited [2003] NSWLEC 174 APPLICANT: Robert Douglas McIlveen PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Baiada Poultry Pty Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 40001 of 2002 CORAM: Lloyd J Injunctions and Declarations :- development consents - extent of KEY ISSUES: Existing Use Rights: - nature and extent - liberal interpretation of consent - continuance and limitations Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 76A, s 81A(1), s 109(1), s 109(2), s 109B, Miscellaneous Acts (Planning) Repeal and Amendment Act 1979 Sch 3 cl 7 LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1919 s 342U Tamworth Local Environmental Plan 1985 Tamworth Local Environmental Plan 1996 Armstrong v Ashfield Municipal Council (2002) 124 LGERA 189; Boral Resources (NSW) Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council (2003) 124 LGERA 90; Hastings Municipal Council v Mineral Deposits Ltd (1981) 43 LGRA 198; CASES CITED: King v Lewis (1991) 74 LGRA 362; King v Lewis (1995) 88 LGERA 183; Mona Vale Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council (2003) 124 LGERA 449; Moore Development Group Pty Ltd v Pittwater City Council [2003] NSWLEC 130; Permewan Wright Consolidated Pty Ltd v Attorney- General (on the relation of Franklins Stores Pty Ltd) (1977) 36 LGRA 381 DATES OF HEARING: 23/06/2003, 24/06/2003, 25/06/2003 and 26/06/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/24/2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate