NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Broadwater Action Group Inc v Richmond Valley Council & Anor [No. 2] [2003] NSWLEC 289 APPLICANT: Broadwater Action Group Inc
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT: Richmond Valley Council
SECOND RESPONDENT: New South Wales Sugar Milling Co-operative Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 10029 of 2003 CORAM: Lloyd J Costs :- in Class 1 - separate determination of preliminary questions in planning and building appeal - status of practice direction - exceptional circumstances
KEY ISSUES: Words and Phrases:- "exceptional circumstances"
Practice and Procedure:- abuse of process - instituting and continuing hopeless applications - inadequate advice - lay representatives
Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 s 19 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 5A, s 98(1) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 63, s 69(2) LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Practice Direction 1993 par 10 Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 6 r 1 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Pt 31 r 1 Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 Pt 3, Pt 6 Div 2 Berk v Woollahra Municipal Council (1992) 78 LGERA 180; Bhamjee v Forsdick (No.2) [2003] EWCA Civ 1113; Botany Municipal Council v Secretary, Department of Arts, Sport, Environment, Tourism and Territories (1992) 34 FCR 412, 76 LGERA 213; Broadwater Action Group Inc v Richmond Valley Council & Anor [2003] NSWLEC 202; Cadonia Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Council (NSWLEC, Bignold J, 5 August 1994, unreported); Carver v Bankstown City Council [1999] NSWLEC 130; CSR Ltd v Fairfield City Council [2001] NSWLEC 221; Damjanovic v Maley (2002) 55 NSWLR 149; Foboco Pty Ltd v Kiama Municipal Council (1998) 109 LGERA 160; Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397; Gibson v Mosman Municipal Council (2001) 116 LGERA 397; Mansfield v Wyong Shire Council (2000) 111 LGERA 403; Maule v Liporoni [No.2] (2002) 122 LGERA 216; Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2001) 51 NSWLR 673; (2001) 114 LGERA 376; CASES CITED: McDonald Industries Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council (1980) 43 LGERA 428; Morris v Gosford City Council (NSWLEC, Bignold J, 29 November 1996, unreported); Nazero Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [No.2] [2002] NSWLEC 194; NSI Group Ltd v Parramatta Council [2002] NSWLEC 76; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; (1998) 96 LGERA 173; Outdoor Australia Pty Ltd v Auburn Council (1996) 89 LGERA 365; Prince v North Sydney Municipal Council (2001) 115 LGERA 65; R v Riscutta and Niga [2003] NSWCCA 6; Rio Pioneer Gravel Co Pty Ltd v Warringah Shire Council (1969) 17 LGRA 153; Rosniak v Government Insurance Office (1997) 41 NSWLR 608; Scott Revay and Unn v Warringah Council (1996) 90 LGERA 78; Smith v Randwick City Council [No.2] [2001] NSWLEC 88; Teese v State Bank of New South Wales [2002] NSWCA 219; Wilson on behalf of Gurrungar Environment Group v Bourke Shire Council & Ors (2001) 116 LGERA 287; Wyong Shire Council v Smith (NSWLEC, Bignold J, 24 December 1992, unreported) DATES OF HEARING: 11/09/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/18/2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate