NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Tradelink Constructions Pty Ltd v Holroyd City Council [2005] NSWLEC 392
APPLICANT Tradelink Constructions Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Holroyd City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11288 of 2003
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- Application - commercial and residential development
Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Part 16 Rule 4(2) LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Practice Direction 1993
Gee v Port Styephens Council [2003] 131 LGERA 25 ; CASES CITED: Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Holroyd City Council [2005] NSWLEC 338
DATES OF HEARING: 01/07/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/26/2005
APPLICANT Ms J Wauchope, solicitor SOLICITORS Maddocks LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr G McKee, solicitor SOLICITORS McKees Legal Solutions
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
26 October 2005
11288 of 2003 Tradelink Constructions Pty Ltd v Holroyd City Council
JUDGMENT
Background 1 This matter concerns a Notice of Motion by the respondent council for costs associated with a Class 1 appeal. The appeal was in respect of a mixed commercial and residential development situated at 33 Sherwood Road, Merrylands, which was ultimately granted approval by consent orders on 4 August 2004.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate