NSW Caselaw
> Reported Decision : 126 LGERA 279
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Snowside Pty Limited v Holroyd City Council [2003] NSWLEC 136 APPLICANT: Snowside Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Holroyd City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 40237 of 2003 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Injunctions and Declarations :- whether proposed development (Bunnings Warehouse) for permissible purpose in General Industrial Zone under LEP LEGISLATION CITED: Donnelly v Delta Gold Pty Ltd (2001) 113 LGERA 34; Enfield City Corporation v Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135; Foodbarn Pty Ltd v Solicitor General (1975) 32 LGRA 157; Jones v Sutherland Shire Council (1979) 40 LGRA 323; CASES CITED: Maryland Development Co Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 75; Marscon Pty Ltd v Holroyd City Council (2003) 123 LGERA 323; University of Sydney v South Sydney Council (1998) 97 LGERA 186; Westpoint Corp Pty Ltd v Rockdale City Council (2000) 109 LGERA 298; Woolworths Ltd v Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd (1996) 92 LGERA 244; Woolworths Ltd v The Warehouse Groups (Australia) Pty Ltd (2003) 123LGERA 341 DATES OF HEARING: 2 June 2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/06/2003
APPLICANT: Mr B Walker SC with Mr J Maston, Barrister SOLICITORS Speed and Stracey LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr P Clay, Barrister SOLICITORS Abbott Tout
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate