NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Johnson v Sutherland Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 92
APPLICANT A Johnson PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sutherland Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10218 of 2005
CORAM: Moore C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application - Subdivision :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan
Tenacity Consulting v Waringah [2004] NSWLEC 140; CASES CITED: Landscape Development Control Plan; .
DATES OF HEARING: 7 September 2005 and 14 February 2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 02/14/2006
APPLICANT Mr S Berveling, barrister LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr C Mathieson, solicitor Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Moore C
14 February 2006
05/10218 A Johnson v Sutherland Shire Council
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. The consequence of the Court's decision in this appeal is the grant of development consent subject to detailed conditions. These conditions are not reproduced as part of this decision but are available for inspection at the Council. In addition, a copy the Court's Orders and the conditions may be obtained from the Court's registry upon payment of a fee. Details of the fee payable and process for obtaining a copy of the Orders and conditions are available on the Court's web site at http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lec/
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate