NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 120 LGERA 292
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Tipfast Pty Ltd v South Sydney City Council [2002] NSWLEC 85 APPLICANT Tipfast Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT South Sydney City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11023 of 2001 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- what constitutes development consent - recycling yard - whether crushing and screening permissible LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 92, s 121B, s121ZK Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 1980 cl 32 Auburn Municipal Council v Szabo (1971) 67 LGRA 427; Halglide Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council and McNamara Property Management Pty Ltd (1990) 71 LGRA 215; Hubertus Schuetzenverein Liverpool Rifle Club Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (1994) 85 LGERA 37 ; Loreto Normanhurst Association Inc v Hornsby Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 45; CASES CITED: Ryde Municipal Council v Royal Ryde Homes & Anor (1970) 19 LGRA 321; Shell Company v Parramatta City Council (1977) 27 LGRA 102; Stebbins & Anor v Lismore City Council (1998) 64 LGERA 132; Sydney Serviced Apartments Pty Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council [No 2] (1993) 78 LGERA 404; Winn v Director General of National Parks and Wildlife and Ors [2001] NSWCA 17; Woolworths Ltd v Campbells Cash and Carry (1996) 92 LGERA 244 DATES OF HEARING: 3, 24 April 2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/07/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate