NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Greg Young v Parramatta City Council [2006] NSWLEC 116
APPLICANT Greg Young PARTIES : RESPONDENT Parramatta City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : (1)0279 of 2002
CORAM: Jagot J
KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- Preliminary questions - where appropriate; Whether satisfied that development as modified would be substantially the same development - question of fact not law - generally not suitable for separate or preliminary determination on a merits appeal; Development proposed to be modified by subdivision - not satisfied that development as modified would be substantially the same development
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4(1), s 4B, s 96(2), s 96(6) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 39(2) LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 1 r5A, Pt 6 r 1, s 39(2), Pt 16 r 4 State Environmental Planning Policy No 5, Housing for Older People or People with a Disability cl 18 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Pt 31 r 2
Ben-Menashe v Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council (2001) 115 LGERA 181; Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464; Comcare v Grimes (1994) 50 FCR 60; Commonwealth v Sciacca (1988) 17 FCR 476; Direct Factory Outlets Homebush Pty Ltd v Property Council of Australia Ltd [2005] FCA 1002; Fernance Family Holdings Pty Ltd v Newcastle City Council (2000) 110 LGERA 67; Grant v Kiama Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 70; Hillpalm Pty Limited v Heaven's Door Pty Limited (2004) 220 CLR 472; Lambidis v Commissioner of Police (1995) 37 NSWLR 320; Lean v Ku-ring-gai Council [1998] NSWLEC 226; Masterton Homes Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council (2003) 124 LGERA 216; McLoughlin v Jones [2002] 2 WLR 1279; Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council v Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act [2006] NSWLEC 57; CASES CITED: Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Daniele (1981) 5 ALD 135; 39 ALR 649; 61 FLR 354 at 359; Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Kurtovic (1990) 21 FCR 193; Mirvac Homes Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (2000) 111 LGERA 233; Monnock v Pittwater Council (2003) 127 LGERA 66; Moto Projects No 2 Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298; North Sydney Council v Michael Standley & Associates Pty Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 468; 1643 Pittwater Road Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council [2004] NSWLEC 685; Russo v Kogarah Municipal Council (1999) 105 LGERA 290 ; Save the Ridge Inc v Commonwealth (2005) 142 LGERA 18; Strathfield Municipal Council v Poynting (2001) 116 LGERA 319; Sydney City Council v Ilenace Pty Limited (1984) 3 NSWLR 414; Tallglen Pty Ltd v Pay TV Holdings Pty Ltd (1996) 22 ACSR 130; Tepko Pty Limited and Others v Water Board (2001) 206 CLR 1; Vacik Pty Limited v Penrith City Council (unreported, Stein J, 10242 of 1991, 24 February 1992); Young v Parramatta City Council (2002) 124 LGERA 361
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate