NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 147 LGERA 214
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Council of Camden v Runko [2006] NSWLEC 486
PROSECUTOR: The Council of Camden PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Robert Runko
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50013 of 2006
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- removal of trees on rural property without development consent – guilty plea – defendant consents to remediation and costs orders – in the exceptional circumstances, order made directing that charge be dismissed pursuant to Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 10.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and assessment Act 1979 ss 125(1), 126(1), 126(3) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss 10, 21A, 22A, 23
Advanced Arbor Service Pty Ltd v Strathfield Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 485; Cameron v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 47; Camilleri's Stockfeed Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683; Council of Camden v Tax (2004) 137 LGERA 368; CASES CITED: Council of the City of Gosford v Tauszik [2005] NSWLEC 266; Environment Protection Authority v Hochtief AG [2006] NSWLEC 200; Gittany Constructions Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 242; Power v Penthill House Pty Ltd (1993) 80 LGERA 247; R v Thomson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 (CA) ; Thorneloe v Filipowski (2004) 52 NSWLR 60
DATES OF HEARING: 07/08/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/09/2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate