NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Fernando and Another [2003] NSWLEC 281 PROSECUTOR Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANTS Chester Fernando Steadfast Maintenance Services Pty Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 50047; 50048 of 2003 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- deliberate and deceitful conduct by individual - whether attributable to company trading as trustee - whether a company entitled to benefit of s 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 19B LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 10 Interpretation Act 1987 s 8(d), s 21 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 143(1), s 143(1)(a), s 241(1)(a), s 241(1)(e) Environment Protection Authority v Virotec International Limited [2002] NSWLEC 110, unreported; Inspector Stewart v Siemans Dematic Pty Ltd (formerly Mannesman Dematic Colby Pty Ltd) No 2 [2003] NSWIRComm 45; John C Morish Pty Ltd v Luckman (1977) 30 FLR 88; CASES CITED: Morrison v Peacock and Roslyndale Shipping Company Pty Ltd [2003] NSWLEC 68, unreported; Reg v O'Neill [1979] 2 NSWLR 582; Sheen v Geo Cornish Pty Ltd (1978) 30 FLR 466; Trade Practices Commission v Sun Alliance Australia Pty Ltd (1994) 16 ATPR 42-286; Workcover Authority of NSW (Inspector Hopkins) v Profab Industries Pty Ltd [2000] NSWIRComm 142 DATES OF HEARING: 31/10/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/19/2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate