NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Sansom v Port Stephens Council (No 2) [2006] NSWLEC 504
APPLICANT PARTIES : Jeffrey Joseph Sansom RESPONDENT Port Stephens Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10155 of 2006
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- Whether costs should follow the event in preliminary question of law in Class 1 proceedings
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 97, Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 16 r 4
Broadwater Action Group Inc v Richmond Valley Council (No 2) (2003) 129 LGERA 401 ; Gee v Port Stephens Council (2003) 131 LGERA 325 ; Gibson v Mosman Municipal Council (2001) 116 LGERA 397 ; CASES CITED: Grant v Kiama Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 70 ; Hunter Development and Brokerage Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council [2005] NSWLEC 727 (16 December 2005) ; Kinder Investments Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council [2005] NSWLEC 737 (9 December 2005) ; Outdoor Australia Pty Ltd v Auburn Council [1996] NSWLEC 71
DATES OF HEARING: 01/08/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/18/2006
APPLICANT Mr J Kildea (Barrister) SOLICITORS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Thompson Norrie Solicitors RESPONDENT Mr J Maston (Barrister) SOLICITORS Sparke Helmore
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate