NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Mete v Warringah Council [2004] NSWLEC 273 APPLICANT Anthony Mete PARTIES : RESPONDENT Warringah Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11629 of 2003 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Planning Instruments :- whether provisions of later instrument prevail and if so to what extent - whether planning instruments can have concurrent effect - whether SEPP(SL) applies to Warringah LGA Construction and Interpretation :- meaning of "zoned" Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 s 79C(1)(a) State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy No 5 cl 2(1) State Environmental Planning Policy (Seniors Living) 2004 cl 2, cl 4, cl 4(1), cl 5(3), cl 12(1)(b), cl 17, cl 25, cl 28, cl 30, cl 38, cl 38(1), cl 51, cl 78, cl 81 Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2000 cl 5(1), cl 29, cl 40, CASES CITED: Gillespies v Warringah Council (2002) 124 LGERA 147; Sofi v Wollondilly Shire Council (1975) 31 LGRA 416 DATES OF HEARING: 14/05/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/31/2004
APPLICANT Mr J A Ayling SC SOLICITORS Hones Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr D P Wilson (Barrister) SOLICITORS Wilshire Webb Solicitors
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 11629 of 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate